AMC to Ticketmaster: hold my beer
One of the last bastions of theatrical exhibition says let's make seeing a movie *more* shitty, not less
Guys, you live on this planet with me1â youâre already more than aware that the world is getting actively worse all the time, in ways environmental (climate change), existential (ChatGPT), and everything in-between (George Santos). We are accustomed at this point to bad news that makes us feel helpless, pawns to a system that not only doesnât serve us anymore but might be actively breaking down in front of our eyes. Itâs cool and rad and we should all feel lucky!
Not one to miss a trend, AMC Theaters announced this morning that they will soon be introducing variable pricing to their seat selection, requiring moviegoers to select between three different seating options any time they see a movie. Drawing straight from the dystopian jargon playbook of classics like âBrave New Worldâ and â1984â, AMC is calling this new initiative âSightline.â Hereâs how it works:
Those great seats in the middle of the auditorium, the ones any sane person would want and for the past ten years of reserved seating have gone to whoever purchases tickets first (not a bad system!) â those are now âPreferredâ Sightline seats, and cost $2 more than they had to this point.
Next up is âStandardâ Sightline, your Joe Schmo/hoi polloi seating, flanking the 1%ers in Preferred. Sure, youâre not getting a primo spot, youâre arcing left or right to see what M3GAN is doing, but youâre not charged more. Youâve broken even!
And last and definitely least is our Kirkland Signature seating: âValueâ Sightline, the very front row, where for $2 cheaper than usual you can watch three hours of James Cameronâs âAvatar: The Way of Waterâ and then afterward put the money you saved toward a neck re-alignment.
For those visual learners out there, hereâs what this seating chart looks like:
Aside from the fact that what youâre looking at is a borderline hateful abdication of color composition, it also strikes me as an ominous bellwether of things to come. Am I almost entirely ignorant about running a business, or the economy, or Wall Street, or why eggs cost so much now? Yes. In the words of noted cinematic character Forrest Gump, âI am not a smart man.â But I DO recognize corporate non-speak when I hear it. Hereâs AMC VP Eliot Hamlisch:
âSightline at AMC more closely aligns AMCâs seat pricing approach to that of many other entertainment venues, offering experienced-based pricing and another way for moviegoers to find value at the movies. While every seat at AMC delivers an amazing moviegoing experience, we know there are some moviegoers who prioritize their specific seat and others who prioritize value moviegoing. Sightline at AMC accommodates both sentiments to help ensure that our guests have more control over their experience, so that every trip to an AMC is a great one.â
âExperienced-based pricingâ? The term makes sense when you consider the difference between, say, a regular and IMAX 3D screening, which are indeed very different experiences. But the implication that people are somehow looking for different âexperiencesâ within the same movie? Give me a break. And on the âvalue moviegoingâ kick â we all understand the concept of matinee pricing, or discount days (which AMC already does, on Tuesdays, for AMC Premiere members such as myself). Thatâs value. To suggest that anyone but sugar-addled eight-year-olds have ever wanted to sit in the front row is just being deliberately fucking dumb.
All of which is to say that at a time when theaters are staring down their own mortality, with audiences already looking for excuses to stay home, further alienating them by turning theaters into the American Airlines queue probably isnât going to inspire renewed brand loyalty! If your whole goal is staving off the extinction of the moviegoing experience? To put it in Gen-Z terms, that ainât it, chief.
Iâm almost mortified by how mad this has all made me2. But like any good therapist will tell you, underneath that anger is sadness â in this case at what feels like an attack on one of our last democratic entertainment options. Broadway got cost-prohibitive decades ago. Professional sports? Concert-going? Forget about it. ButâŚ
âŚtheyâve forever been an equalizing â and screw it, humanizing â force. Rich, poor, you paid the same ticket price and fought for the same seats all to have the same experience, which is to say 90 minutes watching âA Man Called Ottoâ in shared rapture. Who you are outside? Doesnât matter! In this holy temple, everyone is just a fan along for the ride. (I guess itâs sort of like the subway in that sense, and with just as many smells.)
I donât think Eliot Hamlisch or any of the AMC decision-makers care one way or another; theyâre businesspeople trying to turn a profit who, gun to their head, would probably say âtheyâre a fan of a lot of different genresâ when asked to name their favorite movie. But in an era where corporations seem almost suicidally bent on efficiency and optimization (aka robot shit!) itâs worth stopping and acknowledging what we had, and maybe finding ways to hold onto it â possibly at Regal Cinemas or Alamo Drafthouse.
I mean, I assume
so much so that I was inspired to Substack about it
Excellent piece. It's always fun to see a company talk in circles trying to convince you - maybe themselves? - that they're offering you some value, when all they're doing is trying to increase revenue.
This was news to me, and I agree it's kind of wild - the movie theater is the last equalizer. Also sad how effective this will be in the short term: for how infrequently I can manage to go to the movies, I will of course pay the extra $2 - I hate it.
I think you have correctly identified the beginning of the actual end?
If only I could gamble on this. Short AMC stocks, I guess?